[2001] UGCommC 2

[2001] UGCommC 2

The defendant bank persistently failed to comply with court orders to produce banking documents relevant to the plaintiff's account, despite assurances and opportunities. The contradictory explanations from the defendant's counsel regarding the existence and custody of the documents undermined the credibility of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UGCommC 2
Parties
Plaintiff: Said Tibazarwa; Defendant: Uganda Commercial Bank
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 13 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Legal Topics
Bank Customer Relationship, Production of Documents, Striking Out Defence, Liquidated Damages
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Bank Customer Relationship Production of Documents Striking Out Defence Liquidated Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Tibazarwa

Plaintiff

Uganda Commercial Bank

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant bank failed to comply with court orders to produce banking documents pertaining to the plaintiff's account.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's written statement of defence should be struck out for non-compliance with court orders.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the claimed liquidated sum and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant bank persistently failed to comply with court orders to produce banking documents relevant to the plaintiff's account, despite assurances and opportunities. The contradictory explanations from the defendant's counsel regarding the existence and custody of the documents undermined the credibility of the defence. The court found the defendant's arguments speculative and unsupported by evidence. The plaintiff's cooperation in providing his own copies did not absolve the bank of its obligation to comply with the court order. The court invoked Order 10, Rule 21 of the Civil Procedure Rules to strike out the defendant's written statement of defence for non-compliance. As the...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • Defendant's written statement of defence is struck out under Order 10, Rule 21 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of UGX 52,495,315.