[1992] UGHC 6

[1992] UGHC 6

The court found that the applicant, as registered proprietor, had re-entered the land and sought to have this noted in the Register. The Registrar's refusal to note the re-entry was unsupported by any reasons or affidavit in reply, and the Registrar failed to appear or substantiate the refusal. Section 190 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] UGHC 6
Parties
Applicant: Sam Rukuba; Respondent: The Registrar of Titles
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Misc. Application No.3/91
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application_allowed
Legal Topics
Land Registration, Re Entry on Lease, Powers of Registrar, Court Orders Against Registrar
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Registration Re Entry on Lease Powers of Registrar Court Orders Against Registrar

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sam Rukuba

Applicant

The Registrar of Titles

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Chief Registrar of Titles was justified in refusing to note the applicant's re-entry on the Register without providing reasons.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order compelling the Registrar to note the re-entry on the Register.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as registered proprietor, had re-entered the land and sought to have this noted in the Register. The Registrar's refusal to note the re-entry was unsupported by any reasons or affidavit in reply, and the Registrar failed to appear or substantiate the refusal. Section 190 of the Registration of Titles Act gives the court authority to order the Registrar to act appropriately where an aggrieved proprietor applies. The court determined that the applicant's request was justified and unopposed, and that the Registrar's conduct was arbitrary. Accordingly, the application was allowed and the Registrar was ordered to note the re-entry as prayed. Costs were...

Court Disposition

application_allowed

Orders

  • The Registrar of Titles is ordered to note the re-entry of the applicant on the said lease as prayed.
  • The respondent is to pay costs of this application.