[2004] UGHC 20

[2004] UGHC 20

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for the demolished part of her house, pit latrine, and loss of use of land, as her developments were lawfully established and the defendant's demolition was not justified by any valid legal right to destroy the plaintiff's property without compensation....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] UGHC 20
Parties
Plaintiff: Zena Muhammed nee Zena Samusudin; Defendant: Dr. Simon Ssentumbwe
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No.343 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Compensation for Demolition, Land Tenure Disputes, Usufruct Rights, Valuation of Property
Source Language
en
Land and Property Tort Law Compensation for Demolition Land Tenure Disputes Usufruct Rights Valuation of Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zena Muhammed nee Zena Samusudin

Plaintiff

Dr. Simon Ssentumbwe

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for the demolished part of her house and other structures on plot 609.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant was liable for demolishing the plaintiff's property that encroached on his plot.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate quantum of compensation due to the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for the demolished part of her house, pit latrine, and loss of use of land, as her developments were lawfully established and the defendant's demolition was not justified by any valid legal right to destroy the plaintiff's property without compensation. The court preferred the valuation evidence of Mr. Babumba Kyeyune, which was more comprehensive and credible, accounting for the value of the demolished structures, disturbance allowance, and loss of usufruct. The court discounted some of the claimed amounts but ultimately awarded the plaintiff a total of shs 3.9 million, finding that the defendant's actions caused substantial...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff shs 3,900,000 as compensation for the demolished part of the house, pit latrine, loss of use, and disturbance allowance.
  • The defendant shall pay the costs of the suit.