[2011] AfCHPR 9

[2011] AfCHPR 9

The Court determined that it lacks jurisdiction to hear the application because the dispute is exclusively grounded in alleged breaches of an employment contract and staff regulations, which are matters reserved for the Ad hoc Administrative Tribunal of the African Union. The Protocol governing the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights restricts its jurisdiction to cases involving the interpretation and application of the Charter, the Protocol, and other relevant human rights instruments ratified by the States concerned. Since the applicant's claims do not invoke such instruments but rather contractual and administrative employment matters, the application falls outside the Court's...

Citation
[2011] AfCHPR 9
Parties
Applicant: Efoua Mbozo'o Samuel; Respondent: The Pan African Parliament
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
30 September 2011
Case Number
Application No. 010/2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Jurisdictional Ruling
Outcome
application_dismissed_for_lack_of_jurisdiction
Judges
Akuffo VP, Eno R, Guindo J, Mutsinzi J, Ngoepe J, Niyungeko P, Orė J, Ouguergouz J, Tambala J, Thompson J
Legal Topics
Employment Contracts, Jurisdiction of Court, Exhaustion of Remedies
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Employment Contracts Jurisdiction of Court Exhaustion of Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Efoua Mbozo'o Samuel

Applicant

The Pan African Parliament

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Jurisdictional Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights have jurisdiction over employment contract disputes involving the Pan African Parliament.
  2. 2 Has the applicant exhausted local remedies as required by the Rules of Court.
  3. 3 Are the alleged breaches of contract and staff regulations within the competence of the Ad hoc Administrative Tribunal of the African Union.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that it lacks jurisdiction to hear the application because the dispute is exclusively grounded in alleged breaches of an employment contract and staff regulations, which are matters reserved for the Ad hoc Administrative Tribunal of the African Union. The Protocol governing the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights restricts its jurisdiction to cases involving the interpretation and application of the Charter, the Protocol, and other relevant human rights instruments ratified by the States concerned. Since the applicant's claims do not invoke such instruments but rather contractual and administrative employment matters, the application falls outside the Court's...

Court Disposition

application_dismissed_for_lack_of_jurisdiction

Orders

  • The Court finds it has no jurisdiction to hear the case instituted by Efoua Mbozo'o Samuel against the Pan African Parliament.