[2019] UGCA 2121

[2019] UGCA 2121

The Court found that the appellant and his counsel, who were on record, failed to appear for the hearing despite evidence of proper service. The advocates for the appellant did not formally withdraw from the record or notify the court of their inability to represent the appellant. The court concluded that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] UGCA 2121
Parties
Appellant: Samwiri Kibuuka; Respondent: Eriya Lugeya Lubanga
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Appeal No: 211 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
Kasule, JA, Musoke, JA, Musota, JA
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Service of Process, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Service of Process Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samwiri Kibuuka

Appellant

Eriya Lugeya Lubanga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Rule 100(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether proper service was effected on the appellant's advocates.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the appellant and his counsel, who were on record, failed to appear for the hearing despite evidence of proper service. The advocates for the appellant did not formally withdraw from the record or notify the court of their inability to represent the appellant. The court concluded that the appellant had lost interest in prosecuting the appeal, which had been pending since 2013. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution under Rule 100(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, and costs were awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • Civil Appeal No. 211 of 2013 is hereby dismissed.
  • The appellant shall pay costs to the respondent.