[2025] UGHRC 7

[2025] UGHRC 7

The tribunal found that the applicant's testimony, corroborated by his wife and medical evidence, established on a balance of probabilities that he was subjected to severe physical assault, humiliation, and degrading treatment by Regimental Policemen on the orders of Major Nelson Mugerwa. Internal UPDF reports...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHRC 7
Parties
Applicant: Sgt. Byamugisha Felix; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Uganda Human Rights Commission
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Complaint UHRC 2 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Final Decision
Outcome
complaint allowed
Judges
Mariam Wangadya - Chairperson, Stephen Basaliza - Commissioner, Omara Apitta Lamex - Commissioner, Crispin Kaheru - Commissioner
Legal Topics
Freedom From Torture, Vicarious Liability, Compensation for Human Rights Violations, Military Abuse of Power
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Tort Law Freedom From Torture Vicarious Liability Compensation for Human Rights Violations Military Abuse of Power

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sgt. Byamugisha Felix

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Complaint / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's agents violated the complainant's right to freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.
  2. 2 Whether the complainant is entitled to compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the applicant's testimony, corroborated by his wife and medical evidence, established on a balance of probabilities that he was subjected to severe physical assault, humiliation, and degrading treatment by Regimental Policemen on the orders of Major Nelson Mugerwa. Internal UPDF reports admitted excessive force was used. The acts constituted torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment as defined by international and domestic law. The respondent, as the employer, was vicariously liable for the actions of its agents. The right to freedom from torture is absolute and non-derogable under the Constitution. The applicant was therefore entitled to compensation for...

Court Disposition

complaint allowed

Orders

  • The complaint is allowed.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay the complainant U. Shs.25,000,000 (Twenty Five Million Shillings) as general damages for violation of his right to freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.