[1935] EACA 19
The Court held that section 65(2) of the Civil Procedure Ordinance requires every appeal from a Subordinate Court to the Supreme Court to be filed within thirty days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, and that this provision prevails over any conflicting provisions of the Indian Limitation Act, including section 12. The words 'notwithstanding anything contained' are broad and exclude the application of the Indian Limitation Act in its entirety to such appeals. The time for filing an appeal cannot be extended by excluding the period taken to obtain a certified copy of the decree. Furthermore, an application for a copy of the decree is only considered made when received...
- Citation
- [1935] EACA 19
- Parties
- Appellant: B. D. Shahi; Respondent: The Krishna Stores
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1935
- Case Number
- C.A. 26/1934.
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of Kenya to Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; judgment of Magistrate restored
- Judges
- Abrahamas, C.J. (Tanganyika), Law, C.J (Zanzibar), Webb, J
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Periods, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Computation of Time, Conflict of Laws
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. D. Shahi
Appellant
The Krishna Stores
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of Kenya to Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal from the Subordinate Court to the Supreme Court was filed within the statutory period of limitation.
- 2 Whether section 12 of the Indian Limitation Act applies to extend the time for filing appeals under section 65(2) of the Civil Procedure Ordinance.
- 3 Whether the application for a certified copy of the decree is deemed made when posted or when received by the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that section 65(2) of the Civil Procedure Ordinance requires every appeal from a Subordinate Court to the Supreme Court to be filed within thirty days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, and that this provision prevails over any conflicting provisions of the Indian Limitation Act, including section 12. The words 'notwithstanding anything contained' are broad and exclude the application of the Indian Limitation Act in its entirety to such appeals. The time for filing an appeal cannot be extended by excluding the period taken to obtain a certified copy of the decree. Furthermore, an application for a copy of the decree is only considered made when received...
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; judgment of Magistrate restored
Orders
- The appeal is allowed with costs in this Court and in the Supreme Court.
- The judgment of the Magistrate is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment