[2022] UGCA 120
The Court found that the application was irregularly before it due to several procedural defects: it was not fixed for hearing, not signed or dated by counsel, and was only brought to the Court's attention during a short recess. These omissions and commissions rendered the application non-compliant with the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] UGCA 120
- Parties
- Applicant: Shukla Mukesh Babubhai; Respondent: Ssenyonyi Joel Besekezi
- Court
- Court of Appeal of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Election Petition Application No. 47 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Application for Extension of Time and Validation of Appeal Documents
- Outcome
- application struck out; appeal struck out; half costs awarded
- Judges
- Kiryabwire, JA, Musota, JA, Gashirabake, JA
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Validation of Appeal, Procedural Irregularities
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shukla Mukesh Babubhai
Applicant
Ssenyonyi Joel Besekezi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Application for Extension of Time and Validation of Appeal Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to file an appeal against the High Court decision.
- 2 Whether the record of appeal and memorandum of appeal filed by the applicant can be validated by the Court of Appeal despite procedural irregularities.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the application was irregularly before it due to several procedural defects: it was not fixed for hearing, not signed or dated by counsel, and was only brought to the Court's attention during a short recess. These omissions and commissions rendered the application non-compliant with the mandatory procedural requirements for applications before the Court of Appeal. As a result, the application was struck out with half costs, and since the application for extension of time and validation of the appeal documents was unsuccessful, there was no valid appeal before the Court. Consequently, Election Appeal No. 80 of 2021 was also struck out with half costs.
Court Disposition
application struck out; appeal struck out; half costs awarded
Orders
- The application for extension of time and validation of appeal documents is struck out with half costs.
- Election Appeal No. 80 of 2021 is struck out with half costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
### THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
# IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF UGANDA (COA) AT KAMPALA
#### ELECTION PETITION APPLICATION NUMBER 47 OF 2022
SHUKLA MUKESH BABUBHAI =APPLICANT
VS
# SSENYONYI JOEL BESEKEZI <sup>=</sup> <sup>=</sup>===== == ====== == RESPO N DENT
# CORAM: HON. MR. JUSTICE GEOFFREY KIRYABWIRE, JA
## HON. MR. JUSTICE MUSOTA STEPHEN, JA
## HON. MR. JUSTICE GASHIRABAKE CHRISTOPHER, JA
#### RULING OF COURT
The Applicant filed this Application by Notice of Motion under Rule 19 of the Parliamentary Elections (Election Petitions) Rules seeking Orders that the time within which to file an Appeal against the decision of the High Court Judge Hon. Mr. Justice lsaac Muwata delivered on the 14th October, 2O2L in Election Petition No' 09 of 2021 be extended by this Honourable Court
Furthermore, the Record of Appeal and Memorandum of Appeal filed by the Applicant against the decision of Hon. Justice lsaac Muwata of the Civil Division of the High Court of Uganda also be validated by this Honourable Court'
When this Application was called for hearing, Court noted several careless omissions and commissions which do not qualify it for an Application before Court of Appeal. This Application was filed only today 28th March, 2022 and drawn to the attention of Court during our short recess.
ln addition, the Application is not fixed for hearing, it is not signed by Counsel and Counsel has not dated it.
ln the circumstances, this Application is irregularly before Court. lt is according struck out wlth half costs.
Since the Application sought to extend time within which to file the Appeal and validate the Record and Memorandum of Appeal but it has been struck out then it follows that there is no valld Appeal before this Court.
Election Appeal No. 80 of 2021 is accordingly struck out with half costs.
We so order.
,
Dated at Kampala this 26 day of <sup>M</sup>fiC-<t+ t<.,- 2022.
HON. MR. JUSTICE GEOFFREY KIRYABWIRE
JUSTICE OF APPEAL
41,,tr1^^41
HON. MR. JUSTICE MUSOTA STEPHEN
JUSTICE OF APPEAI
# HON. MR. JUSTICE GASHIRABAKE CHRISTOPHER
JUSTICE OF APPEAT