[2019] AfCHPR 54
The court determined that the applications referenced—047/2019, 051/2019, 053/2019, and the previously consolidated 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019—concern similar facts, alleged violations, and requested measures, all directed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. In accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where appropriate in fact and in law, the court found that consolidation would serve the proper administration of justice. The court therefore ordered the joinder of these applications into a single consolidated proceeding, to be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019,...
- Citation
- [2019] AfCHPR 54
- Parties
- Applicant: Diomande Aboubakar Sidiki; Applicant: Traore Aboulaye; Applicant: Adae Tano Alain Christian; Applicant: Fea Charles and Others; Respondent: Republic of Côte d'Ivoire
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2019
- Case Number
- Application No. 047/2019 ; Application No. 051/2019 ; Application No. 053/2019 ; Joint Application No. 28/2019 ; Joint Application No. 30/2019 ; Joint Application No. 31/2019 ; Joint Application No. 33/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Joinder Application / Order for Joinder of Cases
- Outcome
- applications joined and consolidated
- Judges
- Aboud J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Tchikaya J
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Cases, Consolidation of Proceedings, Procedural Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diomande Aboubakar Sidiki
Applicant
Traore Aboulaye
Applicant
Adae Tano Alain Christian
Applicant
Fea Charles and Others
Applicant
Republic of Côte d'Ivoire
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Joinder Application / Order for Joinder of Cases
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applications should be joined due to similarity of facts, alleged violations, and measures requested.
- 2 Whether joinder is appropriate in fact and in law under Rule 54 of the Rules of Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the applications referenced—047/2019, 051/2019, 053/2019, and the previously consolidated 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019—concern similar facts, alleged violations, and requested measures, all directed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. In accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where appropriate in fact and in law, the court found that consolidation would serve the proper administration of justice. The court therefore ordered the joinder of these applications into a single consolidated proceeding, to be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019,...
Court Disposition
applications joined and consolidated
Orders
- The joinder of cases and pleadings in Applications No. 047/2019, 051/2019, and 053/2019 with those in Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019.
- Henceforth, the applications shall be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019, 047/2019, 051/2019 and 053/2019 - Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment