[2008] UGHC 83

[2008] UGHC 83

The court found that the defendant, a Resident District Commissioner, made public statements at Bomah Hotel accusing the plaintiff, a Chief Magistrate, of corruption, rebel collaboration, and incompetence. These statements were made in the presence of others and were not privileged, as they occurred in a public...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] UGHC 83
Parties
Plaintiff: Silver Cohens Okullu; Defendant: Santos Okot Lapolo
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit no.26 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Defamation, Slander, Damages Assessment, Privilege in Defamation
Source Language
en
Tort Law Defamation Slander Damages Assessment Privilege in Defamation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silver Cohens Okullu

Plaintiff

Santos Okot Lapolo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the statements complained of were defamatory of the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the said statements were made by the defendant.
  3. 3 Whether the statements complained of are privileged.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant, a Resident District Commissioner, made public statements at Bomah Hotel accusing the plaintiff, a Chief Magistrate, of corruption, rebel collaboration, and incompetence. These statements were made in the presence of others and were not privileged, as they occurred in a public setting without justification. The court held that the words were defamatory in their natural and ordinary meaning, damaging the plaintiff's reputation and professional standing. The defendant offered no evidence to contradict the plaintiff's testimony or that of his witness. Communications made by the defendant to government authorities in his official capacity were found to be...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff UGX 10,000,000 as compensatory and exemplary damages.
  • Interest on the above sum at 18% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full.