[1998] UGCA 22
The court found that the applicant and his counsel were absent when judgment was delivered and were not served with notice of the delivery date. The explanation that the applicant only learned of the judgment after the time for filing a notice of appeal had expired was accepted as a sufficient reason under Rule 4 of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UGCA 22
- Parties
- Applicant: St. Kizito Youth Farm Ltd; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- Court of Appeal of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Civil Application No. 58 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Sufficient Reason, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
St. Kizito Youth Farm Ltd
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient reason to warrant extension of time to file a notice of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether absence of the applicant and his counsel at the delivery of judgment constitutes sufficient reason for delay.
- 3 Whether the delay in filing the application was inordinate and disentitles the applicant to relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant and his counsel were absent when judgment was delivered and were not served with notice of the delivery date. The explanation that the applicant only learned of the judgment after the time for filing a notice of appeal had expired was accepted as a sufficient reason under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 1996. The delay of approximately six months was distinguished from the precedent in Rosette Kizito, where the delay was 18 months and the reason was mere forgetfulness. The court held that the circumstances justified extension of time, and the application was allowed with costs in the cause.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file notice of appeal out of time.
- The applicant shall file the notice of appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
2 paragraphs
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f199\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f200\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f202\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f203\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f204\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f205\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f206\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f207\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{ \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid7621385 Normal (Web);}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 \styrsid12548188 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid12548188 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid12292\rsid132777\rsid147964\rsid263824\rsid483953\rsid532800\rsid542833\rsid656068\rsid853000\rsid1212221\rsid1263153\rsid1328200\rsid1589256 \rsid1592324\rsid1597739\rsid1769736\rsid1979034\rsid1985355\rsid2100349\rsid2103471\rsid2651407\rsid2753621\rsid2833257\rsid2891500\rsid3035935\rsid3163095\rsid3436095\rsid3891542\rsid3962766\rsid4004402\rsid4013346\rsid4081474\rsid4154319\rsid4606034 \rsid4615111\rsid4804988\rsid4812412\rsid4816222\rsid4994645\rsid5133152\rsid5249105\rsid5257113\rsid5338672\rsid5393925\rsid5510309\rsid5529574\rsid5578182\rsid5599792\rsid5925591\rsid6168920\rsid6227913\rsid6298534\rsid6761646\rsid6774612\rsid7235957 \rsid7297041\rsid7555992\rsid7621385\rsid7699176\rsid7878088\rsid8001677\rsid8538801\rsid8545157\rsid8857076\rsid8875848\rsid9138396\rsid9583136\rsid9729420\rsid9908807\rsid10119127\rsid10167632\rsid10384870\rsid10438333\rsid10438669\rsid10517635 \rsid10564061\rsid10569595\rsid10693564\rsid10703749\rsid10825639\rsid10975670\rsid11025202\rsid11078177\rsid11350863\rsid11555040\rsid11563786\rsid11930287\rsid12526284\rsid12548188\rsid12718503\rsid12742138\rsid13184068\rsid13255604\rsid13435762 \rsid13466614\rsid13512610\rsid13704567\rsid13720995\rsid13914955\rsid14043846\rsid14428627\rsid14626845\rsid14839716\rsid14942689\rsid15430543\rsid15688051\rsid15798275\rsid15818385\rsid15882927\rsid15952220\rsid16061834\rsid16084859\rsid16150457 \rsid16265927\rsid16321832\rsid16581033\rsid16604061\rsid16673595}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA }{\author Wor. Jessica chemeri}{\operator Wor. Jessica chemeri}{\creatim\yr2008\mo9\dy11\hr12\min18} {\revtim\yr2008\mo9\dy19\hr12\min18}{\version5}{\edmins19}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords840}{\nofchars4790}{\nofcharsws5619}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin \dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot7621385\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12548188 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12548188 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12548188 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12548188 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid13184068\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2103471 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs17\insrsid12548188 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs17\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid1592324 3}}}{\cs17\insrsid12548188 \par }\pard \s16\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid12548188 {\insrsid12548188 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1 \widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid3962766 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 }{\b\ul\insrsid3962766 }{ \b\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \line }{\b\insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 }{\b\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line }{ \insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 }{\b\insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 }{\b\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 CIVIL}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 }{\b\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 APPLICATION NO. 58/1997 }{\b\ul\insrsid3962766
\par }{\b\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line ST. KIZITO }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 YOUTH FARM LTD}{\insrsid3962766 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::}{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 APPLICANT(S) \line }{\insrsid3962766 }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 VERSUS \line ATTORNEY }{\insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 GENERAL::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT}{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 (S)}{ \insrsid3962766 \par }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line }{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 RULING }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line This is an application for leave to file notice of appeal out of time. The application is by a notice of motion dated 10/12/97. It is supported by the affidavit of Mr. Yesero Mugenyi counsel for the applicant. The application was lodged under the Provisions of rules 4,}{\b\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 42(1) (2), 43(1) (2) and 52(1) of Court of Appeal Rules 1996. The sole ground upon which the application is based is that the judgment, which is the subject of this application, was delivered in the absence of the applicant and his counsel which resulted in the applicant learning of the outcome of the case after the t}{\insrsid3962766 ime within which to lodge the not}{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 ice of appeal had long expired.}{\insrsid3962766 \par }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line Mr Asa Mugenyi who appeared for the applicant did not have much to say about the application apart fro m insisting that the judgment was delivered in the absence of the applicant and his counsel as they had not been given notice of the date when the judgment was to be delivered. Mr. Cheborion who appeared for the respondent opposed the application on the g r ound that no sufficient reason had been given to warrant extension of time. He further maintained that there had been an inordinate delay in filing the application since judgment was delivered on 16/6/97 and the application was not filed until 12/12/97, o n this point he relied on the case of: }{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 Rossette Kizito v Administrator}{\b\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 }{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 G}{\ul\insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 eneral}{ \insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 }{\ul\insrsid3962766\charrsid3962766 and others [1993]5 }{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 KLR 4. }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line }{\insrsid3962766 }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 Rule 4 of Court of Appeal Rules 1996 under which this application was brought reads as follows:- \line \'934. The court may, for sufficient reason, ext end the time limited by these Rules or by any decision of the court or of the High court for the doing of any act authorised or required by these Rules, whether before or after the expiration of that time and whether before or after the doing of the act; and any reference in these Rules to any such time shall be construed as reference to the time so extended.\'94 \line }{\insrsid3962766 }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 The expression \'93sufficient reason\'94 is not defined anywhere in the rules. In the cases of: }{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 Mugo v W}{\ul\insrsid3962766 anjiri}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 [1970]EA}{\ul\insrsid3962766 481 at page 483. Nj}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 agi v Munyiri [19751EA 179 at page 180 and Rosette Kizito v Administrator General and others [Supreme Court Civil Application No. 9/86 reported }{\ul\insrsid3962766 i}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 n Kam}{\ul\insrsid3962766 pala Law Report Volume 5}{ \ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 of 1993 at page 4] }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 it was held that sufficient reason must relate to the inability or failure to take the particular step in time. In the present case the applicant\rquote s version is that he could not file the notice in time because judgment was delivered in his absence and in the absence of his counsel as they had not been served with notice for delivery of the judgment. It is the applicant\rquote s case that by the time he learnt of the decision of the court the time within which to file notice of appeal had expired. According to the copy of the judgment on the file there is no doubt over the fac t that the judgment was delivered in the absence of the applicant and his counsel and according to the affidavit of Tumwebaze Kenneth, sworn in reply, it is most likely that the applicant might never have been served with the necessary notice for the deli vering of the judgment. Mr. Tumwebaze\rquote s statement in paragraph 7 of his affidavit that Mr. Mugenyi must have been served with hearing notice is not only hearsay but an empty assumption. \line }{\insrsid3962766 }{ \insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 Mr. Cheborion who appeared in this matter on behalf of the respondent argued that there was an inordinate delay in filing this application, he relied on the case of: }{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 Rosette Kizito }{ \ul\insrsid132777\charrsid3962766 v}{\ul\insrsid132777 s.}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 Administrator General [1993]5 KLR 4. }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 In this case the court declined to extend time because of inordinate delay, the application had been filed 18 months from the date the applicant had been ordered to furnish security for costs. The present case can easily be distinguished from Rosette \rquote s case (supra) in that in the instant case the applicant and his counsel were absent when judgment was delivered unlike in the former case w}{\insrsid132777 here the counsel was present at }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 the time an order to deposit security}{\insrsid132777 for costs was made, }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 another difference between the two cases is that in, the case now under consideration the application was filed after about 6 mon ths from date of judgment but in }{\insrsid132777 R}{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 osette\rquote s case the application was filed 18 months late; the other element distinguishing the two cases is that in the present case the applicant has offered lack of knowledge of the outcome of the case as the reason for not acting in time but in Rosette\rquote s case the cou}{\insrsid132777 nsel simply gave as his reason mer}{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 e forgetfulness to deposit the correct amount for security. \line Considering all the circumstances of this application I am }{\insrsid132777 satisfied that the explanation given by the applicant as to why he was unable to file the notice of appeal in time is a sufficient reason within which the meaning of rule 4 of court of appeal rules 1996. The application is allowed with costs in the cause. The applicant is to file his notice of appeal within14 } {\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 (fourteen) days from the dat}{\insrsid132777 e of delivering of this ruling }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 (17/2/98) \line }{\b\insrsid132777 }{ \b\insrsid7621385\charrsid132777 C. M. Kato \line }{\insrsid132777 }{\b\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid132777 JUSTICE OF APPEAL}{\ul\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line }{\insrsid132777 }{\b\insrsid7621385\charrsid132777 17/2/ 98}{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line 17/2/98: - \line Assa Mugenyi for applicant. \line Cheborion for respondent absent. \line Lydia Tuhirirwe court clerk. }{\insrsid132777 \par }{\insrsid7621385\charrsid3962766 \line \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3962766 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid10825639\charrsid3962766 \par }}