[1995] UGSC 2

[1995] UGSC 2

The Supreme Court held that the respondent substantially complied with Rule 81 of the Supreme Court Rules. The statement in the notice of appeal, combined with subsequent correspondence, amounted to a valid application for a copy of proceedings. The Registrar understood and acted upon the request, and the appeal was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] UGSC 2
Parties
Appellant: Stephen Mabosi; Respondent: Uganda Revenue Authority
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Application 16 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed; appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Ministerial Consent, Foreign Currency Claims, Breach of Contract, Assessment of Damages
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Appeal Timelines Ministerial Consent Foreign Currency Claims Breach of Contract Assessment of Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Mabosi

Appellant

Uganda Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's notice of appeal should be struck out for failure to institute the appeal within the prescribed sixty days as required by Rule 81(1) of the Supreme Court Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the statement in the notice of appeal amounted to a valid application for a copy of proceedings under Rule 81(2).
  3. 3 Whether the absence of ministerial consent for payment in foreign currency bars enforcement of the appellant's claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the respondent substantially complied with Rule 81 of the Supreme Court Rules. The statement in the notice of appeal, combined with subsequent correspondence, amounted to a valid application for a copy of proceedings. The Registrar understood and acted upon the request, and the appeal was lodged promptly upon receipt of the proceedings. The Court emphasized that technical defects should not override substantive justice. On the merits of the underlying claim, the Court found that the absence of ministerial consent for payment in foreign currency did not bar enforcement of the appellant's contractual claim. The responsibility to obtain consent lay with the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed; appeal allowed

Orders

  • Application to strike out the notice of appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
  • Appeal allowed with costs; special damages of pound sterling 7,200 to be converted to Uganda Shillings at the rate on 01/01/1993.