[2020] UGHCCD 162
The court found that the first Defendant breached the indemnification agreement by failing to repay the embezzled funds, and the second Defendant, as guarantor, failed to fulfil his obligation upon default by the first Defendant. The Defendants did not contest the claims, and default judgment was entered for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] UGHCCD 162
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Technology Associates Ltd; Defendant: Festo Wafuta; Defendant: Gerald Nangoli
- Court
- HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- CIVIL SUIT NO. 294 OF 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Judges
- Mugambe, J
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Indemnification Agreement, Guarantee Liability, Liquidated Damages, Default Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Technology Associates Ltd
Plaintiff
Festo Wafuta
Defendant
Gerald Nangoli
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first Defendant breached the indemnification agreement executed on 7th November 2016.
- 2 Whether the second Defendant breached the guarantee agreement executed on 7th November 2017.
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to recovery of special damages, general damages, interest, and costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first Defendant breached the indemnification agreement by failing to repay the embezzled funds, and the second Defendant, as guarantor, failed to fulfil his obligation upon default by the first Defendant. The Defendants did not contest the claims, and default judgment was entered for the liquidated sum of USD 19,451. The Plaintiff was also entitled to general damages, interest at 18% per annum from the date of filing until payment in full, and costs. The legal basis for the decision was the Civil Procedure Rules regarding default judgment for liquidated claims and the enforceability of indemnification and guarantee agreements.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- The Plaintiff is directed to recover the decretal sum of USD 19,451 from the Defendants jointly and/or severally.
- The Plaintiff is awarded general damages of Ug. shs: 15,000,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
# **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (CIVIL DIVISION) CIVIL SUIT NO. 294 OF 2017**
## **TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES LTD :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF**
### **VERSUS**
### **1. FESTO WAFUTA**
**2. GERALD NANGOLI ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANTS**
### **BEFORE: LADY JUSTICE LYDIA MUGAMBE**
### **JUDGMENT**
- 1. The Plaintiff brought this suit for a declaration that the first Defendant is in breach of the indemnification agreement executed on 7th November 2016, a declaration that the second Defendant is in breach of the guarantee agreement executed on 7th November 2017, recovery of special damages of USD 19,451, general damages, commercial interest from the date of breach of the agreement, costs of the suit and any other relief the court deems fit. - 2. The first Defendant was employed by the Plaintiff as a human resource manager. In the course of his duties, the first Defendant was availed USD 43,303 for the immigration expenses relating to work permits for the Plaintiff's employees. Along the way the Plaintiff realised that the first Defendant had embezzled part of these funds. Upon auditing by Hen Associates, it was realised that USD 21,010 was not accounted for by the first Defendant. The Plaintiff reported the matter to police vide CRB 963/2016. In an attempt to settle the matter out of court, on 7th November 2016, the Plaintiff, and the first Defendant with the second Defendant as his guarantor, entered into an agreement in which the first Defendant
would pay back the money in instalments. The first defendant only paid back Ug. Shs: 5,600,000/= leaving a balance of USD 19,451.
- 3. After service on the Defendants on many occasions without them filing a written statement of defence or appearing in court and proof of service returned to court, on 28th November 2018, judgment was entered for the decretal sum of USD 19, 451 and the suit was set down for formal proof for the other claims in the plaint. The Plaintiff's witness filed a witness statement. - 4. Order 9 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules provides that where the plaint is drawn claiming a liquidated demand and the defendant fails to file a defence, the court may, subject to rule 5 of this order, pass judgment for any sum not exceeding the sum claimed in the plaint together with interest at the rate specified, if any, or if no rate is specified, at the rate of 8 percent per year to the date of judgment and costs. - 5. Mr. Omondi Wycliff, the Plaintiff's finance manager was the only witness and testified as PW1. He reiterated the averments in the plaint and added that upon default of payment by the first Defendant, notice was given to the second Defendant as the guarantor of the first Plaintiff but there was no response. - 6. The parties entered into an indemnification agreement in which the first Defendant undertook to refund/pay USD 21,010. The second Defendant was the guarantor of this agreement and in paragraph 9 undertook to pay the money if the first Defendant failed. To date the first Defendant has paid Ug. shs: 5,600,000/= leaving a balance of USD 19,451. This decretal sum remains unpaid despite several demands from the Plaintiff. In these circumstances, default judgment was properly entered in the following terms. - i. The Plaintiff is hereby directed to recover the decretal sum of USD 19,451 from the Defendants jointly and/or severally. - ii. The Plaintiff is awarded general damages of Ug. shs: 15,000,000/= (Uganda shillings fifteen million only).
- iii. Interest of 18% p.a is awarded on (i) and (ii) above from the date of filling the suit till payment in full. - iv. The Plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
I so order.
**Lydia Mugambe. Judge. 11 June 2020.**