[2012] UGSC 22

[2012] UGSC 22

The Supreme Court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for being granted leave to appear as amicus curiae. The court emphasized that the role of amicus curiae is to be invited by the court, not to seek admission by application, and that the parties to the appeal were competent to address...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] UGSC 22
Parties
Applicant: The Centre for Arbitration & Dispute Resolution; Appellant: N. S. S. F; Appellant: W. H. Ssentoogo T/A Ssentoogo & Partners; Respondent: Alcon International Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Application 31 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Odoki, CJ
Legal Topics
Amicus Curiae, Arbitration Award, Appeal Rights, Setting Aside Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Amicus Curiae Arbitration Award Appeal Rights Setting Aside Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Centre for Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Applicant

N. S. S. F

Appellant

W. H. Ssentoogo T/A Ssentoogo & Partners

Appellant

Alcon International Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appear as amicus curiae in the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the parties had an affirmative agreement to appeal against the arbitration award on points of law.
  3. 3 Whether an appeal can arise from an order refusing to set aside an arbitration award.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for being granted leave to appear as amicus curiae. The court emphasized that the role of amicus curiae is to be invited by the court, not to seek admission by application, and that the parties to the appeal were competent to address the relevant legal issues. The court also noted that the applicant did not show how its participation would materially assist the court in resolving the appeal. Consequently, the application was dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appear as amicus curiae is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.