[1994] UGHC 27

[1994] UGHC 27

The court found that the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agency agreement for the operation of a petrol station, with the plaintiff entitled to occupy the premises for twelve years. The defendant breached the agreement by appointing a rival dealer and evicting the plaintiff after only one year, despite the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1994] UGHC 27
Parties
Plaintiff: Total Uganda Limited; Defendant: Jim Ann Limited
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No.647 of 1991
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Agency Agreements, Eviction, Special and General Damages
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Land and Property Breach of Contract Agency Agreements Eviction Special and General Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Total Uganda Limited

Plaintiff

Jim Ann Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was a breach of contract by the defendant in relation to the agency agreement for the petrol station premises.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to special and general damages for the breach and eviction.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agency agreement for the operation of a petrol station, with the plaintiff entitled to occupy the premises for twelve years. The defendant breached the agreement by appointing a rival dealer and evicting the plaintiff after only one year, despite the plaintiff's substantial investment in equipment and improvements. The plaintiff proved specific expenditures as special damages and was entitled to general damages for loss of bargain. The claim for interest at 51% was rejected as excessive and unsupported; interest was awarded at court rates. Costs were also awarded to the plaintiff. The defendant, having failed to appear or...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • The plaintiff is awarded special damages of UGX 6,615,600.
  • The plaintiff is awarded general damages of UGX 2,000,000.