[1992] UGHC 1

[1992] UGHC 1

The court held that the central issue was whether the applicant acted mala fide in seeking leave to amend the plaint. After reviewing the affidavit evidence and arguments, the court found no evidence of mala fide intent on the part of the applicant. The court emphasized that the discretion to allow amendments under...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] UGHC 1
Parties
Plaintiff: Transami (U) Ltd; Defendant: Transocean (U) Ltd
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 145 of 1987
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Leave to Amend Plaint
Outcome
preliminary objection overruled
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation of Actions, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Amendment of Pleadings Limitation of Actions Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Transami (U) Ltd

Plaintiff

Transocean (U) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Leave to Amend Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to amend the plaint was brought mala fide to defeat a pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed amendment would improperly circumvent the statute of limitation and introduce a new cause of action.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the central issue was whether the applicant acted mala fide in seeking leave to amend the plaint. After reviewing the affidavit evidence and arguments, the court found no evidence of mala fide intent on the part of the applicant. The court emphasized that the discretion to allow amendments under Order 6 Rule 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules is broad and should be exercised to determine the real questions in controversy, provided no injustice is caused. The court also noted that whether an amendment defeats a limitation defence or introduces a new cause of action are substantive matters to be addressed at the hearing of the application, not at the preliminary objection...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection overruled

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is overruled.
  • The application for leave to amend the plaint may proceed.