[2023] UGIAT 6
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to appear at the scheduled hearing despite being duly served with notice. Regulation 19 of the Insurance Appeals Tribunal Regulations 2019 expressly empowers the Tribunal to dismiss an application in such circumstances. The Tribunal found that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UGIAT 6
- Parties
- Applicant: Tropical Bank Limited; Respondent: Goldstar Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- Insurance Appeals Tribunal (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Appeal 4 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Appeal / Dismissal for Non Appearance
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed for non-appearance of applicant
- Judges
- Nangono Namakiika, chairperson, Mayinja. Panel Member, Okotha, Panel Member, Mayanja
- Legal Topics
- Non Appearance, Dismissal of Appeal, Insurance Dispute, Tribunal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tropical Bank Limited
Applicant
Goldstar Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insurance Appeal / Dismissal for Non Appearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement of the appeal under the relevant regulations.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to appear at the scheduled hearing despite being duly served with notice. Regulation 19 of the Insurance Appeals Tribunal Regulations 2019 expressly empowers the Tribunal to dismiss an application in such circumstances. The Tribunal found that the respondent was present and ready to proceed, but the applicant's absence justified dismissal. The Tribunal further noted that the applicant retains the right to apply for reinstatement of the appeal within thirty days, as provided by Regulation 19(2).
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed for non-appearance of applicant
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed for non-appearance by the applicant without costs.
- The applicant may apply to reinstate the appeal within thirty days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
# **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA**
#### **IN THE INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL AT KAMPALA**
#### **APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2023**
**TROPICAL BANK LIMITED::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::** :: **:::::::: : :: :: ::::::::: APPLICANT**
**VERSUS**
**GOLDSTAR INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED I** ;: **; :** ::**:: : ::::: :::::::::: : RESPONDENT**
### **RULING**
# **INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.**
This appeal was filed by the Applicant on the 29,h of June, 2023 challenging the decision of the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA) contained in its letter dated 2nd June 2023, under reference No. IRAB/COMP.76/9/2021.
The appeal challenges the decision by IRA which states that;
- 1. The Applicant pays UGX *25,* 973, 924 as a premium to the respondent within 20 working days from the date of receipt of this decision - 2. The Respondent to issue a new invoice to the Applicant to facilitate the payment within <sup>7</sup> days from the date of receipt of this decision - 3. The respondent must provide proof of payment within 30 working days from receipt of this decision.
The appeal was fixed for hearing before the Tribunal on 25ih September 2023 at 10:00 o'clock in the morning and a hearing notice dated 5,h September 2023 served by the Tribunal and received by both the Applicant and the Respondent is on record.
On the day of the hearing, the Respondent, who was represented by Mr. Semambo Rashid and Mr. Wasswa Kasim Ssernsalo of Semambo & Semambo Advocates, appeared but there was no appearance made by the Applicant or its counsel.
## **Ruling of the Tribunal.**
We have considered the provisions of Regulation 19 of the Insurance Appeals Tribunal Regulations 2019 and it provides as follows;
# **19. Non-appearance of the Applicant**
(1) Where, on the date fixed for the hearing of an application, the Respondent appears but the Applicant does not appear, the Tribunal may dismiss the application.
It is trite law that where a matter has been fixed for hearing and on the day and at the time it is called for hearing the Applicant does not appear, the court may dismiss it (see the decision of Madrama <sup>J</sup> as he then was in **Kampala International University V Tororo Cement & Others High Court Civil Application No. 433 of 2006)**
Consequently, having fixed the appeal to be heard on 25th September 2023 at 10:00 o'clock in the morning, and the Applicant having failed to appear on the day and time when the appeal wos called, the Tribunal dismisses the appeal for non-appearance by the Applicant without costs.
The Applicant is at liberty to apply to this Tribunal to reinstate this appeal within thirty (30) days from the date hereof in accordance with Regulation <sup>19</sup> (2) of the Insurance Appeals Tribunal Regulations.
It's so ordered!
Delivered at Kampala this
Rita Namakiika Nangono
**CHAIRPERSON**
Solome Mayinja Luwaga
Dr. John Bbale Mayanja **MEMBER**