[2005] UGHC 25

[2005] UGHC 25

The court found that the plaintiff was unlawfully and unjustifiably shot by LDUs who were acting as agents of the state, having been called to the scene under false pretenses by the second defendant. The LDUs, while engaged in the maintenance of law and order, exceeded their mandate by shooting an unarmed civilian....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGHC 25
Parties
Plaintiff: Turaganise George; Defendant: Attorney General; Defendant: Lukwago; Defendant: Muwanga Mohammed; Defendant: Mukwaya George
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No.338 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; damages awarded against all defendants jointly and severally, apportioned by degree of liability.
Legal Topics
Vicarious Liability, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment, Use of Firearms, State Liability
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Vicarious Liability Personal Injury Damages Assessment Use of Firearms State Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Turaganise George

Plaintiff

Attorney General

Defendant

Lukwago

Defendant

Muwanga Mohammed

Defendant

Mukwaya George

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the shooting and injury of the plaintiff by the 3rd and 4th defendants was lawful or justified.
  2. 2 Whether the 3rd and 4th defendants were acting in the course of their employment at the material time.
  3. 3 Whether the first defendant is liable for the acts of the other defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was unlawfully and unjustifiably shot by LDUs who were acting as agents of the state, having been called to the scene under false pretenses by the second defendant. The LDUs, while engaged in the maintenance of law and order, exceeded their mandate by shooting an unarmed civilian. The Attorney General, as representative of the state, was held vicariously liable for 50% of the damages, while the second defendant was personally liable for 30%, and the third and fourth defendants for 10% each. The court rejected the defense that the plaintiff was attempting to disarm the LDUs, finding no credible evidence to support this claim. The court awarded damages for...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; damages awarded against all defendants jointly and severally, apportioned by degree of liability.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay the plaintiff a total of UGX 33,568,000 as damages.
  • Interest at 20% per annum on the decretal sum from the date of judgment until payment in full.