[2008] UGHC 19

[2008] UGHC 19

The applicant established a prima facie case for leave to apply for judicial review. The petition to remove him from office was not signed by the required two-thirds majority, was not served on the applicant, and was scheduled for discussion while the applicant was on study leave, denying him an opportunity to be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] UGHC 19
Parties
Applicant: Tusubira Steven; Respondent: Iganga Town Council; Respondent: Butanda Salim; Respondent: Kakuba Aggrey; Respondent: Kalenge Abdullah Tiffu; Respondent: Nkono Amini; Respondent: Nabirye Margaret; Respondent: Lehana Muhamad; Respondent: Dhabasadha Uthman
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2008
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Outcome
leave granted to apply for judicial review
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Natural Justice, Local Government Petitions, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Natural Justice Local Government Petitions Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tusubira Steven

Applicant

Iganga Town Council

Respondent

Butanda Salim

Respondent

Kakuba Aggrey

Respondent

Kalenge Abdullah Tiffu

Respondent

Nkono Amini

Respondent

Nabirye Margaret

Respondent

Lehana Muhamad

Respondent

Dhabasadha Uthman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for leave to apply for judicial review.
  2. 2 Whether the petition to remove the applicant from office complied with statutory and procedural requirements.
  3. 3 Whether failure to serve the applicant with the petition and notice breached rules of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant established a prima facie case for leave to apply for judicial review. The petition to remove him from office was not signed by the required two-thirds majority, was not served on the applicant, and was scheduled for discussion while the applicant was on study leave, denying him an opportunity to be heard. These actions breached statutory requirements and the rules of natural justice. The seriousness of the complaint and procedural irregularities justified granting leave to bring an application for judicial review. The court ordered that the application for judicial review be filed within 14 days, with costs to abide the outcome of the main application.

Court Disposition

leave granted to apply for judicial review

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to bring an application for judicial review for the reliefs claimed.
  • Such application shall be filed within 14 days from the date of this order.