[2002] UGHCCRD 4

[2002] UGHCCRD 4

The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of defilement under section 123(1) of the Penal Code Act. The evidence presented was insufficient to require the accused to make a defence. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted under section 71(1) of the Trial on Indictments Decree and discharged from the charge of defilement.

Citation
[2002] UGHCCRD 4
Parties
Applicant: Uganda; Defendant: Zungu Ismail
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
1 July 2002
Case Number
HCT-04-CR-SC-0026/2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Outcome
acquittal
Judges
Rugadya, J
Legal Topics
Defilement, Prima Facie Case, Acquittal, Burden of Proof
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Uganda

Applicant

Zungu Ismail

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Law / Ruling on No Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case requiring the accused to make a defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain a conviction for defilement under section 123(1) PCA.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of defilement under section 123(1) of the Penal Code Act. The evidence presented was insufficient to require the accused to make a defence. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted under section 71(1) of the Trial on Indictments Decree and discharged from the charge of defilement.

Court Disposition

acquittal

Orders

  • The accused, Zungu Ismail, is acquitted of the offence of defilement C/S 123(1) PCA.
  • He is discharged and set free unless held on other lawful charges.