[1989] ACHPR 2

[1989] ACHPR 2

The African Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that have not ratified or acceded to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Since Angola is not a party to the Charter, the communication is inadmissible under Article 101 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1989] ACHPR 2
Parties
Applicant: Union National de Liberation de Cabinda; Respondent: Angola
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 24 of 1989
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Communications, State Party Requirement, Self Determination, Jurisdiction of Commission
Source Language
en
Public International Law Admissibility of Communications State Party Requirement Self Determination Jurisdiction of Commission

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Union National de Liberation de Cabinda

Applicant

Angola

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction to consider a communication against a State not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
  2. 2 Whether the alleged denial of self-determination by Angola is admissible before the Commission.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that have not ratified or acceded to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Since Angola is not a party to the Charter, the communication is inadmissible under Article 101 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure. The Commission's mandate is limited to States parties, and it cannot entertain complaints against non-member States regardless of the substance of the allegations.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.