[2006] UGCommC 35

[2006] UGCommC 35

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that US$22,438.56 remained unpaid for work done under the contract, as certified by interim certificates and not contradicted by any evidence of payment from the defendant. The defendant failed to comply with the contractual procedure for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] UGCommC 35
Parties
Plaintiff: Vambeco Enterprises Ltd; Defendant: Vienna Academy Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 419 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Construction Contracts, Termination of Contract, Damages Assessment
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Construction Contracts Termination of Contract Damages Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vambeco Enterprises Ltd

Plaintiff

Vienna Academy Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover US$22,438.56 from the defendant for work done under the construction contract.
  2. 2 Whether the termination of the contract by the defendant was lawful and in accordance with the agreement.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for breach of contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that US$22,438.56 remained unpaid for work done under the contract, as certified by interim certificates and not contradicted by any evidence of payment from the defendant. The defendant failed to comply with the contractual procedure for termination, specifically the requirement to give the contractor 14 days' notice to remedy defaults before termination. The termination was therefore unlawful and not in accordance with the agreement. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the outstanding sum, interest at court rate from 7th May 2001 until payment in full, and general damages for breach of contract, assessed at...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of US$22,438.56.
  • Interest at court rate awarded from 7th May 2001 until payment in full.