[2015] UGIC 14

[2015] UGIC 14

The Hon. Chief Judge expressed discomfort in being on the panel for this matter. In accordance with judicial ethics and proper procedure, the case is referred to the High Court for determination to ensure impartiality and proper adjudication. The referral is made to avoid any appearance of bias or impropriety in the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] UGIC 14
Parties
Applicant: Washington Inima & Simon Horace Semanda; Respondent: Eltahir Mohammad & Oil Com (U) Ltd
Court
Industrial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 51 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Referral to High Court
Outcome
referred_to_high_court
Legal Topics
Panel Composition, Jurisdiction, Referral Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Panel Composition Jurisdiction Referral Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Washington Inima & Simon Horace Semanda

Applicant

Eltahir Mohammad & Oil Com (U) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Referral to High Court

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Court panel is properly constituted to hear the matter.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be referred to the High Court for determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The Hon. Chief Judge expressed discomfort in being on the panel for this matter. In accordance with judicial ethics and proper procedure, the case is referred to the High Court for determination to ensure impartiality and proper adjudication. The referral is made to avoid any appearance of bias or impropriety in the proceedings.

Court Disposition

referred_to_high_court

Orders

  • This matter will be referred to the High Court for determination.