[2016] UGHCCRD 492

[2016] UGHCCRD 492

The court found that the applicant did not have knowledge or possession of the additional evidence—letters from the Administrator General and Commissioner Land Registration—at the time of trial or when he gave evidence. The letters came into existence after the trial and sentencing. The respondent did not file an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] UGHCCRD 492
Parties
Applicant: Peter Wasswa Weraga; Respondent: Uganda
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
27 June 2016
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application No. 66 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Adduce Additional Evidence on Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
Murangira, J
Legal Topics
Adducing Additional Evidence, Criminal Appeal Procedure, Affidavit Evidence, Forgery, Utterance of False Documents
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Adducing Additional Evidence Criminal Appeal Procedure Affidavit Evidence Forgery Utterance of False Documents

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Wasswa Weraga

Applicant

Uganda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Adduce Additional Evidence on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to adduce additional evidence in the pending criminal appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant had knowledge or possession of the additional evidence at the time of trial.
  3. 3 Whether the additional evidence is material to the determination of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant did not have knowledge or possession of the additional evidence—letters from the Administrator General and Commissioner Land Registration—at the time of trial or when he gave evidence. The letters came into existence after the trial and sentencing. The respondent did not file an affidavit in reply, leaving the applicant's affidavit evidence unchallenged. The court held that the requirements for adducing additional evidence on appeal were met: the evidence was not available at trial, was material, and its admission was in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the application was allowed and the applicant was granted leave to adduce the additional evidence...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to adduce additional evidence in Criminal Appeal No. 52 of 2015.
  • The additional evidence shall be adduced in accordance with Section 41 of the Criminal Procedure Code Act, Cap.116.