[2016] UGHCCRD 492
The court found that the applicant did not have knowledge or possession of the additional evidence—letters from the Administrator General and Commissioner Land Registration—at the time of trial or when he gave evidence. The letters came into existence after the trial and sentencing. The respondent did not file an...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] UGHCCRD 492
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Wasswa Weraga; Respondent: Uganda
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2016
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application No. 66 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Adduce Additional Evidence on Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- Murangira, J
- Legal Topics
- Adducing Additional Evidence, Criminal Appeal Procedure, Affidavit Evidence, Forgery, Utterance of False Documents
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Wasswa Weraga
Applicant
Uganda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Adduce Additional Evidence on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to adduce additional evidence in the pending criminal appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant had knowledge or possession of the additional evidence at the time of trial.
- 3 Whether the additional evidence is material to the determination of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant did not have knowledge or possession of the additional evidence—letters from the Administrator General and Commissioner Land Registration—at the time of trial or when he gave evidence. The letters came into existence after the trial and sentencing. The respondent did not file an affidavit in reply, leaving the applicant's affidavit evidence unchallenged. The court held that the requirements for adducing additional evidence on appeal were met: the evidence was not available at trial, was material, and its admission was in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the application was allowed and the applicant was granted leave to adduce the additional evidence...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to adduce additional evidence in Criminal Appeal No. 52 of 2015.
- The additional evidence shall be adduced in accordance with Section 41 of the Criminal Procedure Code Act, Cap.116.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment