[1998] UGCA 24

[1998] UGCA 24

The court found that while the applicant had sufficiently demonstrated his lack of means and thus qualified as a pauper on the facts, he failed to satisfy the second requirement under Rule 112(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 1996: that his intended appeal had a reasonable possibility of success. The intended appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UGCA 24
Parties
Applicant: Yekoyakimu Mwima Hyabene; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Application No. 46 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Pauper Status
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Pauper Proceedings, Security for Costs, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Pauper Proceedings Security for Costs Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yekoyakimu Mwima Hyabene

Applicant

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Pauper Status

  1. 1 Whether the applicant qualifies to be declared a pauper under Rule 112(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 1996.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's intended appeal has a reasonable possibility of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant had sufficiently demonstrated his lack of means and thus qualified as a pauper on the facts, he failed to satisfy the second requirement under Rule 112(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 1996: that his intended appeal had a reasonable possibility of success. The intended appeal was based on the same facts and legal issues as a previous appeal (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No.14 of 1994 Hyabene v Attorney General), in which the Supreme Court had already ruled against the applicant, holding that the trial judge was justified in refusing to disqualify himself. The Court of Appeal, bound by the Supreme Court's decision, concluded that there was no...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for pauper status is dismissed.
  • The applicant is to bear his own costs.