[2011] UGHC 25
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal in this matter because the intended appeal is a second appeal, which is a creature of statute under Section 72 of the Civil Procedure Act and does not require leave unless it is a third appeal under Section 73. The applicant failed to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] UGHC 25
- Parties
- Applicant: Yonah Mukaga; Respondent: Bwire Otema
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 2011
- Case Number
- HCT-04-CV-MA-149-2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Merits
- Outcome
- application struck out with costs
- Judges
- Musota, J
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Jurisdiction, Technicalities in Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yonah Mukaga
Applicant
Bwire Otema
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal in this matter.
- 2 Whether the application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is properly before the court.
- 3 Whether citing the wrong law or technical errors in the application are fatal to the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal in this matter because the intended appeal is a second appeal, which is a creature of statute under Section 72 of the Civil Procedure Act and does not require leave unless it is a third appeal under Section 73. The applicant failed to file a notice of appeal within the prescribed 14 days as required by the Judicature (Court of Appeal) Rules, and only the Court of Appeal has the power to extend time for filing a notice of appeal. The application was brought under the wrong legal provisions and in the wrong court. Technical errors in the application, such as citing the wrong law or seeking leave to appeal to...
Court Disposition
application struck out with costs
Orders
- The application is struck out as incompetent and bad in law.
- The applicant shall pay the costs of this application to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment