[2024] UGHC 997

[2024] UGHC 997

The appellant failed to take any reasonable or required steps to prosecute the appeal, including not filing the record of appeal or written submissions as directed by the court. The only document filed was a provisional memorandum of appeal, which is not recognized by law as commencing a civil appeal. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] UGHC 997
Parties
Appellant: Yumaru Florence; Respondent: Arijole Nason Adala
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Appeal 31 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; lower court judgment and orders upheld
Judges
Acellam, J
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Trespass to Land, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure Trespass to Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yumaru Florence

Appellant

Arijole Nason Adala

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant took reasonable steps to prosecute the appeal within the required time period.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 43 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  3. 3 Whether the judgment and orders of the lower court should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to take any reasonable or required steps to prosecute the appeal, including not filing the record of appeal or written submissions as directed by the court. The only document filed was a provisional memorandum of appeal, which is not recognized by law as commencing a civil appeal. The court found that the appellant was using the appeal as a tactic to frustrate the respondent and prevent enjoyment of the lower court's judgment. Applying Order 43 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court exercised its power to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and upheld the judgment and orders of the lower court. Costs were awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; lower court judgment and orders upheld

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • The judgment and orders in Civil Suit No. 0005 of 2015 are upheld.