[2005] UGHC 4

[2005] UGHC 4

The court found that the applicants had complied with all procedural requirements under Order 42A of the Civil Procedure Rules and had demonstrated a substantial interest in the gazetting of their application for registration of a political party. The respondent, a public officer, was under a statutory duty to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGHC 4
Parties
Applicant: Hon. Zachary Olum; Applicant: Mr. Mariano Drametu; Respondent: Registrar General
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application No. 10 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review (ex Parte)
Outcome
Leave granted to file application for order of mandamus.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Political Party Registration, Right of Association
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Judicial Review Mandamus Political Party Registration Right of Association

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hon. Zachary Olum

Applicant

Mr. Mariano Drametu

Applicant

Registrar General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review (ex Parte)

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to leave to apply for an order of mandamus against the Registrar General for failure to gazette their application for registration of a political party.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have complied with all procedural requirements for leave to apply for judicial review.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's failure to act prejudices the applicants' constitutional rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had complied with all procedural requirements under Order 42A of the Civil Procedure Rules and had demonstrated a substantial interest in the gazetting of their application for registration of a political party. The respondent, a public officer, was under a statutory duty to gazette the application within a specified period, and failure to do so prejudiced the applicants' constitutional right to association. The supporting affidavits established a prima facie case for mandamus, as the respondent's inaction could result in the applicants being time-barred from registering their party. The court held that it was just and fair to grant leave to the...

Court Disposition

Leave granted to file application for order of mandamus.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to file the application for an order of mandamus against the respondent.
  • No order as to costs.