Mirka v Muort [2023] DIFC CT 219 (16 August 2023)

Mirka v Muort [2023] DIFC CT 219 (16 August 2023)

The Defendant's appeal notice did not include evidence against the amounts claimed by the Claimant and failed to meet the requirements under RDC 53.91; therefore, permission to appeal is refused.

Citation
[2023] DIFC CT 219
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Mirka; Defendant/appellant: Muort
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
16 August 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal Permission Application / Order on Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Appeal, Permission to Appeal, Costs
Civil Procedure Appeal Permission to Appeal Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mirka

Claimant/respondent

Muort

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Permission Application / Order on Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted under RDC 53.91

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's appeal notice did not include evidence against the amounts claimed by the Claimant and failed to meet the requirements under RDC 53.91; therefore, permission to appeal is refused.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • The Permission Application is refused.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.