Odhran v Oralia [2026] DIFC ENF 047 (12 March 2026)

The Appeal meets the requirements under RDC 44.19 as there are compelling reasons for the Appeal to be heard, based on the grounds raised by the Judgment Creditor.

Citation: [2026] DIFC ENF 047
Parties: Judgment Creditor/appellant: Odhran; Judgment Debtor/respondent: Oralia
Jurisdiction: United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date: 12 March 2026
Procedural Posture: Enforcement Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted
Outcome: Permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics: Appeal Permission, Asset Disclosure, Territorial Jurisdiction

Civil Procedure Enforcement Appeal Permission Asset Disclosure Territorial Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Odhran

Judgment Creditor/appellant

Oralia

Judgment Debtor/respondent

Procedural Posture

Enforcement Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted

Legal Issues

1 Whether RDC Part 50 examinations are territorially confined to assets within the DIFC
2 Whether permissible questioning in enforcement proceedings can extend beyond assets located in the DIFC

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal meets the requirements under RDC 44.19 as there are compelling reasons for the Appeal to be heard, based on the grounds raised by the Judgment Creditor.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted

Orders

The Judgment Creditor’s Application for Permission to Appeal is granted.
Costs shall be costs in the case.