Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla v Expresso Telecom Group Ltd [2022] DIFC CA 002 (23 June 2022)

Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla v Expresso Telecom Group Ltd [2022] DIFC CA 002 (23 June 2022)

The parties consented to procedural directions for the filing of e-bundles and skeleton arguments, and agreed that there should be no order as to costs at this stage.

Citation
[2022] DIFC CA 002
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Tarig H. A. G. Rahamtalla; Defendant/appellant: Expresso Telecom Group Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
23 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consent Order on Procedural Directions
Outcome
Consent order issued for procedural directions; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Appeal Procedure, Consent Order, Case Management
Civil Procedure Appeal Procedure Consent Order Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tarig H. A. G. Rahamtalla

Claimant/respondent

Expresso Telecom Group Ltd

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Consent Order on Procedural Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the parties should be directed to file e-bundles and skeleton arguments by a specified date
  2. 2 Whether there should be an order as to costs at this stage

Ratio Decidendi

The parties consented to procedural directions for the filing of e-bundles and skeleton arguments, and agreed that there should be no order as to costs at this stage.

Court Disposition

Consent order issued for procedural directions; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The parties will file their e-bundles and skeleton arguments by 4pm on 24 June 2022.
  • No order as to costs.