Ostin v Oleda [2026] DIFC ENF 185 (16 January 2026)

Ostin v Oleda [2026] DIFC ENF 185 (16 January 2026)

Permission to appeal is granted because there are compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard, specifically regarding the interpretation of Article 31(4) of the New DIFC Courts Law, satisfying the requirements of RDC 44.19.

Citation
[2026] DIFC ENF 185
Parties
Judgment Creditor/applicant: Ostin; Judgment Debtor/respondent: Oleda
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
16 January 2026
Procedural Posture
Enforcement Order / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Appeals, Interpretation of Statutes, Enforcement of Judgments
Civil Procedure Appeals Interpretation of Statutes Enforcement of Judgments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ostin

Judgment Creditor/applicant

Oleda

Judgment Debtor/respondent

Procedural Posture

Enforcement Order / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted under RDC 44.19
  2. 2 Proper interpretation of Article 31(4) of the New DIFC Courts Law

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal is granted because there are compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard, specifically regarding the interpretation of Article 31(4) of the New DIFC Courts Law, satisfying the requirements of RDC 44.19.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted

Orders

  • The Judgment Creditor’s Application for Permission to Appeal is granted.
  • Costs shall be costs in the case.