Architeriors Interior Design (L.L.C) v Emirates National Investment Co (L.L.C) [2026] DIFC TCD 001 (29 January 2026)
The court found the time claimed for preparation of the skeleton argument excessive given the duplication of work from the initial application. A reasonable and proportionate costs award was assessed at AED 44,000.00.
- Citation
- [2026] DIFC TCD 001
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Architeriors Interior Design (L. L. C); Defendant/appellant: Emirates National Investment Co (L. L. C)
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (technology and Construction Division) / Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Costs assessed in favour of the Claimant at AED 44,000.00.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Costs, Standard Basis, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Architeriors Interior Design (L. L. C)
Claimant/respondent
Emirates National Investment Co (L. L. C)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (technology and Construction Division) / Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the reasonable and proportionate amount of costs to be awarded to the Claimant following dismissal of the Defendant's renewed application for permission to appeal?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the time claimed for preparation of the skeleton argument excessive given the duplication of work from the initial application. A reasonable and proportionate costs award was assessed at AED 44,000.00.
Court Disposition
Costs assessed in favour of the Claimant at AED 44,000.00.
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant AED 44,000.00 as assessed costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment