Otila (2) Ondray [2026] DIFC ARB 032 (09 February 2026)

Otila (2) Ondray [2026] DIFC ARB 032 (09 February 2026)

The Second Defendant, Mr Ozlynn, and Mr Ozlem intentionally and deliberately breached the Injunction and ASI Order in six distinct ways, constituting continuing contempt of court. Their actions undermine the administration of justice and warrant substantial fines, referral to the Attorney General, and indemnity costs.

Citation
[2026] DIFC ARB 032
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Oswin; First Defendant/respondent: Otila; Second Defendant/respondent: Ondray; Contemnor: Ozlynn; Contemnor: Ozlem
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
09 February 2026
Procedural Posture
Arbitration/committal Application / Order With Reasons (post Hearing)
Outcome
Committal Application granted; Defendants found in contempt.
Legal Topics
Committal for Contempt, Anti Suit Injunctions, Enforcement of Court Orders, Summary Assessment of Costs
Arbitration Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Committal for Contempt Anti Suit Injunctions Enforcement of Court Orders Summary Assessment of Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oswin

Claimant/applicant

Otila

First Defendant/respondent

Ondray

Second Defendant/respondent

Ozlynn

Contemnor

Ozlem

Contemnor

Procedural Posture

Arbitration/committal Application / Order With Reasons (post Hearing)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants breached the Injunction and ASI Order issued by the DIFC Court
  2. 2 Whether the conduct amounts to contempt of court under RDC Part 52
  3. 3 Appropriate sanctions for contempt

Ratio Decidendi

The Second Defendant, Mr Ozlynn, and Mr Ozlem intentionally and deliberately breached the Injunction and ASI Order in six distinct ways, constituting continuing contempt of court. Their actions undermine the administration of justice and warrant substantial fines, referral to the Attorney General, and indemnity costs.

Court Disposition

Committal Application granted; Defendants found in contempt.

Orders

  • Adjournment Application refused.
  • Personal service of Committal Application on Mr Ozlem dispensed with.