LXT Real Estate Broker L.L.C v SIR Real Estate L.L.C [2026] DIFC CFI 073 (15 January 2026)
Permission to appeal the costs order is rejected because the court acted within its discretion under RDC 38.7 and 38.8, neither party was dominantly successful, the offer was sufficiently definite to be considered, and no exceptional circumstances or procedural errors were demonstrated.
- Citation
- [2026] DIFC CFI 073
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: LXT Real Estate Broker L. L. C; Defendant/applicant: SIR Real Estate L. L. C
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Civil Claim / Permission to Appeal Costs Order
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal costs order rejected
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Security for Costs, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LXT Real Estate Broker L. L. C
Claimant/respondent
SIR Real Estate L. L. C
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Claim / Permission to Appeal Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal the costs order should be granted
- 2 Whether the court erred in principle or law in making no order as to costs
- 3 Whether the court properly considered offers to settle and payment of security
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal the costs order is rejected because the court acted within its discretion under RDC 38.7 and 38.8, neither party was dominantly successful, the offer was sufficiently definite to be considered, and no exceptional circumstances or procedural errors were demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal costs order rejected
Orders
- The Permission to Appeal Application is rejected.
- There shall be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment