Oratio v Orangia [2026] DIFC ARB 043 (03 March 2026)
The Court found the claimed costs were reasonable and within the ordinary range for commercial litigation, but reduced recovery to 80% for proportionality.
- Citation
- [2026] DIFC ARB 043
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Oratio; Defendant/applicant: Orangia
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Related Costs Order / Post Strike Out Application, Costs Assessment
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of Respondent; Applicant to pay 80% of claimed costs with interest if unpaid within 14 days.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Strike Out Application, Interest on Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Oratio
Claimant/respondent
Orangia
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Related Costs Order / Post Strike Out Application, Costs Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs claimed by the Respondent for the Strike-Out Application were reasonably incurred, reasonable in amount, and proportionate to the matters in issue
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the claimed costs were reasonable and within the ordinary range for commercial litigation, but reduced recovery to 80% for proportionality.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of Respondent; Applicant to pay 80% of claimed costs with interest if unpaid within 14 days.
Orders
- Applicant to pay Respondent AED 24,589.44 within 14 days.
- Interest at 9% per annum to accrue if payment is not made within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment