Corinth Pipeworks SA v Barclays Bank Plc [2011] DIFC CA 002 (22 January 2011)

Corinth Pipeworks SA v Barclays Bank Plc [2011] DIFC CA 002 (22 January 2011)

The DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over civil or commercial claims involving a 'Centre Establishment', which includes the entire legal entity licensed in the DIFC, not just its DIFC branch. The jurisdiction is not limited to acts or transactions of the DIFC branch, but extends to the whole entity, subject to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The appeal is allowed and the claim may proceed in the DIFC Courts.

Citation
[2011] DIFC CA 002
Parties
Appellant/claimant: Corinth Pipeworks SA; Respondent/defendant: Barclays Bank PLC
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
22 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Deputy Chief Justice Granting Respondent's Application for Declaration of No Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
DIFC Court Jurisdiction, Interpretation of 'centre Establishment', Forum Non Conveniens, Corporate Legal Personality, Branch Vs. Entity Distinction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Corinth Pipeworks SA

Appellant/claimant

Barclays Bank PLC

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Deputy Chief Justice Granting Respondent's Application for Declaration of No Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over claims against a foreign bank with a DIFC branch for acts committed outside the DIFC
  2. 2 Interpretation of 'Centre Establishment' under Article 5(A)(1)(a) of Dubai Law No. 12 of 2004
  3. 3 Whether jurisdiction is limited to conduct of the DIFC branch or extends to the whole legal entity

Ratio Decidendi

The DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over civil or commercial claims involving a 'Centre Establishment', which includes the entire legal entity licensed in the DIFC, not just its DIFC branch. The jurisdiction is not limited to acts or transactions of the DIFC branch, but extends to the whole entity, subject to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The appeal is allowed and the claim may proceed in the DIFC Courts.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Claim form reinstated
  • Respondent to pay costs of the appeal and the application below, to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed