Corinth Pipeworks SA v Barclays Bank Plc [2011] DIFC CA 002 (22 January 2011)
The DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over civil or commercial claims involving a 'Centre Establishment', which includes the entire legal entity licensed in the DIFC, not just its DIFC branch. The jurisdiction is not limited to acts or transactions of the DIFC branch, but extends to the whole entity, subject to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The appeal is allowed and the claim may proceed in the DIFC Courts.
- Citation
- [2011] DIFC CA 002
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Corinth Pipeworks SA; Respondent/defendant: Barclays Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Deputy Chief Justice Granting Respondent's Application for Declaration of No Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- DIFC Court Jurisdiction, Interpretation of 'centre Establishment', Forum Non Conveniens, Corporate Legal Personality, Branch Vs. Entity Distinction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corinth Pipeworks SA
Appellant/claimant
Barclays Bank PLC
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Deputy Chief Justice Granting Respondent's Application for Declaration of No Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over claims against a foreign bank with a DIFC branch for acts committed outside the DIFC
- 2 Interpretation of 'Centre Establishment' under Article 5(A)(1)(a) of Dubai Law No. 12 of 2004
- 3 Whether jurisdiction is limited to conduct of the DIFC branch or extends to the whole legal entity
Ratio Decidendi
The DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over civil or commercial claims involving a 'Centre Establishment', which includes the entire legal entity licensed in the DIFC, not just its DIFC branch. The jurisdiction is not limited to acts or transactions of the DIFC branch, but extends to the whole entity, subject to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The appeal is allowed and the claim may proceed in the DIFC Courts.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Claim form reinstated
- Respondent to pay costs of the appeal and the application below, to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment