Mahina v (1) Mahfuz (2) Mahendra [2022] DIFC SCT 015 (16 February 2022)
The First Defendant admitted liability for the employment dues, and the Second Defendant's failure to establish the start-up or provide evidence of progress constituted a fundamental breach of the Investment Agreement, entitling the Claimant to reimbursement.
- Citation
- [2022] DIFC SCT 015
- Parties
- Claimant: Mahina; First Defendant: Mahfuz; Second Defendant: Mahendra
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Employment Dues, Unpaid Salaries, Investment Agreement, Breach of Contract, Reimbursement of Investment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahina
Claimant
Mahfuz
First Defendant
Mahendra
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to unpaid employment dues from the First Defendant
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to reimbursement of investment from the Second Defendant due to breach of the Investment Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The First Defendant admitted liability for the employment dues, and the Second Defendant's failure to establish the start-up or provide evidence of progress constituted a fundamental breach of the Investment Agreement, entitling the Claimant to reimbursement.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- The First Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 302,337 in employment dues.
- The Second Defendant shall pay the Claimant USD 30,000 (equivalent to AED 110,640).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment