Mahina v (1) Mahfuz (2) Mahendra [2022] DIFC SCT 015 (16 February 2022)

Mahina v (1) Mahfuz (2) Mahendra [2022] DIFC SCT 015 (16 February 2022)

The First Defendant admitted liability for the employment dues, and the Second Defendant's failure to establish the start-up or provide evidence of progress constituted a fundamental breach of the Investment Agreement, entitling the Claimant to reimbursement.

Citation
[2022] DIFC SCT 015
Parties
Claimant: Mahina; First Defendant: Mahfuz; Second Defendant: Mahendra
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
16 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Claim allowed in part
Legal Topics
Employment Dues, Unpaid Salaries, Investment Agreement, Breach of Contract, Reimbursement of Investment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mahina

Claimant

Mahfuz

First Defendant

Mahendra

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to unpaid employment dues from the First Defendant
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to reimbursement of investment from the Second Defendant due to breach of the Investment Agreement

Ratio Decidendi

The First Defendant admitted liability for the employment dues, and the Second Defendant's failure to establish the start-up or provide evidence of progress constituted a fundamental breach of the Investment Agreement, entitling the Claimant to reimbursement.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part

Orders

  • The First Defendant shall pay the Claimant AED 302,337 in employment dues.
  • The Second Defendant shall pay the Claimant USD 30,000 (equivalent to AED 110,640).