Alexander Reuter (2) Carlo Pianese (3) Andre Bledjian v (1) Wellness United INC. (2) Jacob Logothetis (AKA Iakovos Logothetis) (3) Angela Turovskaya [2024] DIFC CFI 107 (07 February 2024)

Alexander Reuter (2) Carlo Pianese (3) Andre Bledjian v (1) Wellness United INC. (2) Jacob Logothetis (AKA Iakovos Logothetis) (3) Angela Turovskaya [2024] DIFC CFI 107 (07 February 2024)

The application was refused because the defendants failed to provide any explanation for their lack of engagement with the process, did not indicate any grounds for appeal, and did not comply with previous court orders.

Citation
[2024] DIFC CFI 107
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Alexander Reuter; Claimant/respondent: Carlo Pianese; Claimant/respondent: Andre Bledjian; Defendant/applicant: Wellness United INC.; Defendant/applicant: Jacob Logothetis (aka Iakovos Logothetis); Defendant/applicant: Angela Turovskaya
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
07 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Application to Set Aside Order and Seek Extension for Appeal
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Setting Aside Orders, Appeal Procedure
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Setting Aside Orders Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Reuter

Claimant/respondent

Carlo Pianese

Claimant/respondent

Andre Bledjian

Claimant/respondent

Wellness United INC.

Defendant/applicant

Jacob Logothetis (aka Iakovos Logothetis)

Defendant/applicant

Angela Turovskaya

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Judgment Application to Set Aside Order and Seek Extension for Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants should be granted a set aside of the order refusing extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether a stay of enforcement and extension of time to appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The application was refused because the defendants failed to provide any explanation for their lack of engagement with the process, did not indicate any grounds for appeal, and did not comply with previous court orders.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • The application to set aside the order is refused.
  • No order as to costs.