Dario Echeverry Campos v A.L.L Altered Labs Licensing Ltd & Ors [2024] ADGMCFI 0017 (30 October 2024)
The Claimants made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding patent status and technology, inducing the Defendants to enter the Joint Venture Agreement. The Claimant's consent to resign and transfer shares was not vitiated by duress; the Joint Venture was validly dissolved on 4 August 2022. The Defendants' counterclaim for damages succeeds; the Claimants' claims for damages, specific performance, and injunctive relief are dismissed.
- Citation
- [2024] ADGMCFI 0017
- Parties
- First Claimant: Dario Echeverry Campos; Second Claimant: A. L. L Altered Labs Licensing Limited; First Defendant: Richard Milton Parish; Second Defendant: Vincent Roy Gordon; Third Defendant: Voltage Enterprises Limited; Fourth Defendant: Brand Rocket Limited; Fifth Defendant: Aquarius Global Limited; Sixth Defendant: Kinetic7 Technologies Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial and Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; Defendants' counterclaim partially succeeds.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Termination of Joint Venture, Patent Registration, Duress, Specific Performance, Injunctive Relief, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dario Echeverry Campos
First Claimant
A. L. L Altered Labs Licensing Limited
Second Claimant
Richard Milton Parish
First Defendant
Vincent Roy Gordon
Second Defendant
Voltage Enterprises Limited
Third Defendant
Brand Rocket Limited
Fourth Defendant
Aquarius Global Limited
Fifth Defendant
Kinetic7 Technologies Limited
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial and Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimants made fraudulent or reckless misrepresentations inducing entry into the Joint Venture Agreement
- 2 Whether the Claimant's consent to resign and transfer shares was vitiated by duress
- 3 Whether the Joint Venture Agreement was validly dissolved
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimants made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding patent status and technology, inducing the Defendants to enter the Joint Venture Agreement. The Claimant's consent to resign and transfer shares was not vitiated by duress; the Joint Venture was validly dissolved on 4 August 2022. The Defendants' counterclaim for damages succeeds; the Claimants' claims for damages, specific performance, and injunctive relief are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; Defendants' counterclaim partially succeeds.
Orders
- First Claimant to pay First Defendant AED 8,423,364.
- First Claimant to pay simple interest at 5% per annum on the Judgment Sum from date of judgment until payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment