Merut v Musort [2023] DIFC SCT 383 (05 December 2023)
The Claimant is entitled to September revenue and a reasonable estimate of commission for the notice period despite being on garden leave, as garden leave should not deprive her of earnings she would have made from pre-booked appointments. The notice period is 30 days as per the contract and law. The Defendant must pay DEWS contributions as calculated, unless already paid into the qualifying scheme. Claims for flight ticket and insurance reimbursement are dismissed as not contractually or statutorily required. The Defendant's counterclaim for defamation and breach of contract is dismissed for lack of evidence.
- Citation
- [2023] DIFC SCT 383
- Parties
- Claimant/defendant in Counterclaim: Merut; Defendant/claimant in Counterclaim: Musort
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Dispute (small Claims Tribunal) / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Garden Leave, Notice Period, Commission Entitlement, DEWS Contributions, Counterclaim for Defamation, End of Service Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merut
Claimant/defendant in Counterclaim
Musort
Defendant/claimant in Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute (small Claims Tribunal) / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to revenue and commission during notice period while on garden leave
- 2 Calculation and payment of DEWS contributions
- 3 Eligibility for flight ticket and medical insurance reimbursement
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant is entitled to September revenue and a reasonable estimate of commission for the notice period despite being on garden leave, as garden leave should not deprive her of earnings she would have made from pre-booked appointments. The notice period is 30 days as per the contract and law. The Defendant must pay DEWS contributions as calculated, unless already paid into the qualifying scheme. Claims for flight ticket and insurance reimbursement are dismissed as not contractually or statutorily required. The Defendant's counterclaim for defamation and breach of contract is dismissed for lack of evidence.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant AED 42,000 for September revenue and notice period revenue.
- Defendant to pay Claimant's DEWS contributions of AED 10,870.70, unless already paid into the qualifying scheme.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment