Awad v 3AM Property Investment Company LLC & Anor [2025] ADGMCFI 0003 (07 March 2025)
The Land Investment Contract is a binding and enforceable contract creating contractual rights between the parties, but does not confer in rem rights to the Claimant as registration of title is required under Abu Dhabi law. The First Defendant breached the LIC by failing to comply with its terms, including exclusion of the Claimant from management and failure to register his share. The Claimant is entitled to a monetary award against the First Defendant, but the debt has not yet accrued due. The claim for monetary relief against the Second Defendant fails as the requirements for personal liability under Article 84 of Federal Law 33/2021 were not met.
- Citation
- [2025] ADGMCFI 0003
- Parties
- Claimant: Faysal Mohamad Awad; First Defendant: 3AM Property Investment Company LLC; Second Defendant: Adel Abdulhameed Ibrahim Abdulla Alhosani
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/civil (joint Venture/contract/real Estate) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed; claim against First Defendant succeeds in part; claim against Second Defendant for monetary relief dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Venture, Land Investment Contract, Enforceability of Contracts, Remedies for Breach, Specific Performance, Registration of Land Rights, Limitation of Actions, Manager Liability, Corporate Veil, Estoppel, Remedies (damages, Specific Performance)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Faysal Mohamad Awad
Claimant
3AM Property Investment Company LLC
First Defendant
Adel Abdulhameed Ibrahim Abdulla Alhosani
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial/civil (joint Venture/contract/real Estate) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the Land Investment Contract (LIC) binding and enforceable?
- 2 Did the Claimant acquire in rem rights under the LIC?
- 3 Is the Claimant entitled to monetary relief and if so, against whom?
Ratio Decidendi
The Land Investment Contract is a binding and enforceable contract creating contractual rights between the parties, but does not confer in rem rights to the Claimant as registration of title is required under Abu Dhabi law. The First Defendant breached the LIC by failing to comply with its terms, including exclusion of the Claimant from management and failure to register his share. The Claimant is entitled to a monetary award against the First Defendant, but the debt has not yet accrued due. The claim for monetary relief against the Second Defendant fails as the requirements for personal liability under Article 84 of Federal Law 33/2021 were not met.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed; claim against First Defendant succeeds in part; claim against Second Defendant for monetary relief dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that the Land Investment Contract is binding and enforceable.
- Declaration that the Claimant did not acquire in rem rights under the LIC.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment