MAG Development Services Limited v (1) The Collection Club Restaurant Limited (2) Laurent Buisine (3) Hugo Valat [2026] DIFC CFI 092 (19 January 2026)
The initial claim connected to the Consent Order is relevant to the justification of the AED 2,000,000 cost claimed by the Claimant and must be produced. Other requests either lack sufficient relevance, are not in the parties' possession, or amount to fishing expeditions and are therefore refused. The adequacy of evidence and compliance with disclosure obligations are matters for trial.
- Citation
- [2026] DIFC CFI 092
- Parties
- Claimant: MAG Development Services Limited; First Defendant: The Collection Club Restaurant Limited; Second Defendant: Laurent Buisine; Third Defendant: Hugo Valat
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial Lease Dispute) / Interlocutory (document Production Orders)
- Outcome
- Partially allowed; document production ordered in part, remainder dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Lease Agreements, Document Production, Disclosure Obligations, Force Majeure, Breach of Contract, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAG Development Services Limited
Claimant
The Collection Club Restaurant Limited
First Defendant
Laurent Buisine
Second Defendant
Hugo Valat
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial Lease Dispute) / Interlocutory (document Production Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant and Defendants complied with disclosure obligations under the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC)
- 2 Whether the Defendants are entitled to production of the initial claim connected to the Consent Order between the Claimant and Red Rose Lounge
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to production of internal communications and financial documents from the Defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The initial claim connected to the Consent Order is relevant to the justification of the AED 2,000,000 cost claimed by the Claimant and must be produced. Other requests either lack sufficient relevance, are not in the parties' possession, or amount to fishing expeditions and are therefore refused. The adequacy of evidence and compliance with disclosure obligations are matters for trial.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed; document production ordered in part, remainder dismissed.
Orders
- Claimant to produce the initial claim connected to the Consent Order between Claimant and Red Rose Lounge dated 21 August 2023.
- Claimant's Document Requests Nos. 13 and 17 are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment