Larue v (1) Lasharonrepresented By Its Manager Mr. Latrish (2) Lavada (3) Lavonte [2022] DIFC SCT 062 (21 April 2022)

Larue v (1) Lasharonrepresented By Its Manager Mr. Latrish (2) Lavada (3) Lavonte [2022] DIFC SCT 062 (21 April 2022)

The First Defendant remained in occupation after expiry of the lease without renewal, subleased the premises without authority, and failed to pay rent or respond to the Claimant. The Claimant is entitled to overstay rent, penalties, compensation for the rent-free period, outstanding service charges, forfeiture of the security deposit, and maintenance costs from the First Defendant. The Second and Third Defendants, having fulfilled their obligations under the sublease, are not liable to the Claimant.

Citation
[2022] DIFC SCT 062
Parties
Claimant: Larue; First Defendant: Lasharon represented by its manager Mr. Latrish; Second Defendant: Lavada; Third Defendant: Lavonte
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
21 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal (sct) Lease Dispute / Judgment After Hearing and Further Submissions
Outcome
Claim allowed in part against the First Defendant; dismissed against the Second and Third Defendants.
Legal Topics
Lease Termination, Overstay Rent, Sublease, Security Deposit Forfeiture, Service Charges, Jurisdiction of DIFC Courts
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Property Law Lease Termination Overstay Rent Sublease Security Deposit Forfeiture Service Charges +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Larue

Claimant

Lasharon represented by its manager Mr. Latrish

First Defendant

Lavada

Second Defendant

Lavonte

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal (sct) Lease Dispute / Judgment After Hearing and Further Submissions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the First Defendant is liable for overstay rent, penalties, and service charges after expiry of the lease agreement
  2. 2 Whether the Second and Third Defendants are liable for any amounts to the Claimant
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to forfeit the security deposit and claim maintenance costs

Ratio Decidendi

The First Defendant remained in occupation after expiry of the lease without renewal, subleased the premises without authority, and failed to pay rent or respond to the Claimant. The Claimant is entitled to overstay rent, penalties, compensation for the rent-free period, outstanding service charges, forfeiture of the security deposit, and maintenance costs from the First Defendant. The Second and Third Defendants, having fulfilled their obligations under the sublease, are not liable to the Claimant.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part against the First Defendant; dismissed against the Second and Third Defendants.

Orders

  • First, Second and Third Defendants to vacate the premises within 14 days.
  • Possession of the premises reverts to the Claimant.