Faridoon v Faustina [2015] DIFC SCT 018 (12 March 2015)

Faridoon v Faustina [2015] DIFC SCT 018 (12 March 2015)

Faustina was entitled to end of service gratuity, compensation for vacation leave, and unpaid salary as per DIFC Employment Law and her employment contract, despite termination during probationary period. Feisal was entitled to compensation for 30 days’ notice. The net sum owed to Faustina was AED 439 plus court fees.

Citation
[2015] DIFC SCT 018
Parties
Claimant/defendant in Counterclaim: Faridoon; Defendant/claimant in Counterclaim: Faustina
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Judgment Date
12 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed; counterclaim partly allowed; net sum awarded to Faustina.
Legal Topics
Probationary Period, Notice Period, End of Service Gratuity, Vacation Leave, Unpaid Salary

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faridoon

Claimant/defendant in Counterclaim

Faustina

Defendant/claimant in Counterclaim

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment

  1. 1 Entitlement to end of service gratuity during probationary period
  2. 2 Obligation to provide notice during probationary period
  3. 3 Compensation for vacation leave and unpaid salary

Ratio Decidendi

Faustina was entitled to end of service gratuity, compensation for vacation leave, and unpaid salary as per DIFC Employment Law and her employment contract, despite termination during probationary period. Feisal was entitled to compensation for 30 days’ notice. The net sum owed to Faustina was AED 439 plus court fees.

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed; counterclaim partly allowed; net sum awarded to Faustina.

Orders

  • Faridoon shall pay Faustina the sum of AED 439 and the court's fee.
  • All other claims dismissed for lack of supporting evidence.