Naathim v (1) Nabeel (2) Nasrullah [2024] DIFC SCT 205 (06 September 2024)
The Claimant failed to provide evidence of payment of AED 75,000 to the Second Defendant or AED 10,000 to the First Defendant. The Second Defendant's email confirmed the contractual mechanism for early termination, entitling it to a penalty of AED 18,750. The claims for refunds are dismissed and the counterclaim for the penalty is allowed.
- Citation
- [2024] DIFC SCT 205
- Parties
- Claimant: Naathim; First Defendant: Nabeel; Second Defendant: Nasrullah
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed, counterclaim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Agreement, Breach of Contract, Early Termination, Refund of Rent, Counterclaim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naathim
Claimant
Nabeel
First Defendant
Nasrullah
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant paid the rent amount of AED 75,000 to the Second Defendant
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of AED 10,000 from the First Defendant
- 3 Whether the Second Defendant is entitled to early termination penalty under the Tenancy Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant failed to provide evidence of payment of AED 75,000 to the Second Defendant or AED 10,000 to the First Defendant. The Second Defendant's email confirmed the contractual mechanism for early termination, entitling it to a penalty of AED 18,750. The claims for refunds are dismissed and the counterclaim for the penalty is allowed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed, counterclaim allowed
Orders
- The Claimant’s claims are dismissed.
- The Claimant shall pay the Second Defendant AED 18,750 as early termination penalty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment