FEDERAL PROPERTIES LIMITED v IBRAHIM [2025] ADGMCFI 0027 (10 November 2025)
Counterclaimants' contribution to registration fees is limited to the DMT fee that would have applied prior to the ADGM regime, with set-off against costs awarded. Costs are summarily assessed on the standard basis, with downward adjustment to avoid double counting, and apportioned according to reasonable and proportionate expenditure by each party.
- Citation
- [2025] ADGMCFI 0027
- Parties
- Claimant/counterdefendant/first Counterdefendant: Federal Properties Limited - Sole Proprietorship LLC (also known as Federal Properties Limited); Defendant/first Counterclaimant: Rawafid H Jazairi Ibrahim; Second Counterclaimant: Ausama Ahmed Ibrahim; Second Counterdefendant: Department of Municipalities and Transport - Abu Dhabi (DMT); Defendant/counterclaimant: Amir Sadik Ali Al Samarraie; Defendant/counterclaimant: Zaid Auisama Ibrahim
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Real Property / Post Trial, Summary Assessment of Costs
- Outcome
- Judgment for Counterclaimants on costs and registration fee set-off.
- Legal Topics
- Torrens System, Indefeasibility of Title, Equitable Obligations, Summary Assessment of Costs, Registration Fees, Set Off of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Federal Properties Limited - Sole Proprietorship LLC (also known as Federal Properties Limited)
Claimant/counterdefendant/first Counterdefendant
Rawafid H Jazairi Ibrahim
Defendant/first Counterclaimant
Ausama Ahmed Ibrahim
Second Counterclaimant
Department of Municipalities and Transport - Abu Dhabi (DMT)
Second Counterdefendant
Amir Sadik Ali Al Samarraie
Defendant/counterclaimant
Zaid Auisama Ibrahim
Defendant/counterclaimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Real Property / Post Trial, Summary Assessment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Counterclaimants should contribute to registration fees for transfer of title
- 2 Assessment and apportionment of costs on the standard basis
- 3 Application of set-off between registration fees and costs awarded
Ratio Decidendi
Counterclaimants' contribution to registration fees is limited to the DMT fee that would have applied prior to the ADGM regime, with set-off against costs awarded. Costs are summarily assessed on the standard basis, with downward adjustment to avoid double counting, and apportioned according to reasonable and proportionate expenditure by each party.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Counterclaimants on costs and registration fee set-off.
Orders
- In ADGMCFI-2023-249, Claimant to pay Counterclaimants' costs of AED 220,227 (AED 184,927 substantive, AED 36,300 permission to appeal, less AED 1,000 registration fee set-off).
- In ADGMCFI-2024-047, Claimant to pay Counterclaimant's costs of AED 784,300 (AED 750,000 substantive, AED 36,300 permission to appeal, less AED 2,000 registration fee set-off).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment