Olia v Onawa [2025] DIFC SCT 333 (06 November 2025)
Permission to appeal is granted because the original judgment failed to consider the Claimant's core allegations of harassment and victimisation, and there was a serious procedural irregularity that may have led to an unjust outcome. A re-hearing is necessary to properly address these issues.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] DIFC SCT 333
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Olia; Defendant/appellant: Onawa
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted; Re Hearing Ordered
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted; re-hearing ordered
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Termination, Victimisation, Harassment, Payroll Deductions, Procedural Fairness, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Olia
Claimant/appellant
Onawa
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted; Re Hearing Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant was unlawfully terminated and victimised for instituting proceedings
- 2 Whether the Defendant was entitled to recover alleged overpayments
- 3 Whether the Defendant failed to comply with statutory payroll requirements
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because the original judgment failed to consider the Claimant's core allegations of harassment and victimisation, and there was a serious procedural irregularity that may have led to an unjust outcome. A re-hearing is necessary to properly address these issues.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted; re-hearing ordered
Orders
- Permission to appeal is granted.
- A re-hearing of the matter by way of appeal is to be listed, duration estimate half a day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment