Globe Investment Holdings Limited v (1) Commercial Bank Of Dubai (2) Hortin Holding Limited (3) Lodge Hill Limited (4) Westdene Investment Limited (5) VS 1897 (Cayman) Limited [2023] DIFC CFI 028 (04 July 2023)
The DIFC Court has jurisdiction to grant a worldwide freezing order in aid of enforcement of a foreign judgment only against parties who are judgment debtors or non-cause of action defendants in the relevant enforcement proceedings. The court does not have jurisdiction over VS 1897 (Cayman) Limited or Commercial Bank of Dubai as they are not judgment debtors nor parties to the enforcement proceedings. The WFO may be continued against the BVI Companies, who are judgment debtors under the Sharjah judgment and parties to the BVI enforcement proceedings. The applicant failed to establish jurisdiction over VS 1897 and CBD, and the proceedings against them are dismissed.
- Citation
- [2023] DIFC CFI 028
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Globe Investment Holdings Limited; Respondent/defendant: Commercial Bank Of Dubai; Respondent/defendant: Hortin Holding Limited; Respondent/defendant: Lodge Hill Limited; Respondent/defendant: Westdene Investment Limited; Respondent/defendant: VS 1897 (Cayman) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Freezing Injunction/enforcement of Foreign Judgment / Order on Continuation of Worldwide Freezing Order (wfo) and Jurisdictional Challenge
- Outcome
- Partial grant and partial dismissal
- Legal Topics
- Worldwide Freezing Orders, Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Fraud Allegations, Corporate Structure and Control
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Globe Investment Holdings Limited
Applicant/claimant
Commercial Bank Of Dubai
Respondent/defendant
Hortin Holding Limited
Respondent/defendant
Lodge Hill Limited
Respondent/defendant
Westdene Investment Limited
Respondent/defendant
VS 1897 (Cayman) Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Freezing Injunction/enforcement of Foreign Judgment / Order on Continuation of Worldwide Freezing Order (wfo) and Jurisdictional Challenge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the DIFC Court has jurisdiction to grant a worldwide freezing order (WFO) against the Respondents, particularly VS 1897 and CBD, in aid of enforcement of a foreign judgment
- 2 Whether the applicant has a good arguable case for enforcement of the Sharjah judgment
- 3 Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets justifying a WFO
Ratio Decidendi
The DIFC Court has jurisdiction to grant a worldwide freezing order in aid of enforcement of a foreign judgment only against parties who are judgment debtors or non-cause of action defendants in the relevant enforcement proceedings. The court does not have jurisdiction over VS 1897 (Cayman) Limited or Commercial Bank of Dubai as they are not judgment debtors nor parties to the enforcement proceedings. The WFO may be continued against the BVI Companies, who are judgment debtors under the Sharjah judgment and parties to the BVI enforcement proceedings. The applicant failed to establish jurisdiction over VS 1897 and CBD, and the proceedings against them are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Partial grant and partial dismissal
Orders
- Proceedings against VS 1897 (Cayman) Limited and Commercial Bank of Dubai are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- The worldwide freezing order is continued against the BVI Companies (Hortin Holding Limited, Lodge Hill Limited, Westdene Investment Limited) as judgment debtors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment