A24 v B24 [2025] ADGMCFI 0019 (25 August 2025)
Under UAE law, as clarified by the October 2023 decision of the Dubai Court of Cassation, the dismissal of an arbitration due to non-payment of costs does not render the arbitration agreement null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed. The arbitration agreement remains valid and either party may recommence arbitration. Therefore, the proceedings must be stayed under section 16(2) of the Arbitration Regulations 2015.
- Citation
- [2025] ADGMCFI 0019
- Parties
- Claimant: A24; Defendant: B24
- Jurisdiction
- United Arab Emirates
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial and Civil / Jurisdictional Challenge at First Instance
- Outcome
- Proceedings stayed pursuant to section 16(2) of the Arbitration Regulations 2015.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreement, Jurisdiction, Non Payment of Arbitration Costs, Governing Law of Arbitration Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A24
Claimant
B24
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial and Civil / Jurisdictional Challenge at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed due to non-payment of advance on costs
- 2 Whether the proceedings should be stayed under section 16(2) of the Arbitration Regulations 2015
- 3 What law governs the arbitration agreement for the purpose of section 16(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Under UAE law, as clarified by the October 2023 decision of the Dubai Court of Cassation, the dismissal of an arbitration due to non-payment of costs does not render the arbitration agreement null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed. The arbitration agreement remains valid and either party may recommence arbitration. Therefore, the proceedings must be stayed under section 16(2) of the Arbitration Regulations 2015.
Court Disposition
Proceedings stayed pursuant to section 16(2) of the Arbitration Regulations 2015.
Orders
- The proceeding be stayed pursuant to section 16(2) of the Arbitration Regulations 2015.
- No order as to costs in relation to the Jurisdiction Application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment